Match statistics snapshot
- Nagoya Grampus created the clearer chances on xG (2.70 vs 3.81, Δ 1.11).
- Nagoya Grampus fired more attempts (20 vs 13 shots).
- Nagoya Grampus was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 2.70 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.81Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 16Lead |
| 5 | Shots off target | 10Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 20Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 393Lead | Accurate passes | 390 |
| 477 | Total passes | 480Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kawasaki Frontale | Statistic | Nagoya Grampus |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |