Match statistics snapshot
- Keçiörengücü fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Amed was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 33%).
- Keçiörengücü held more of the ball (63% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 7Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 63%Lead | Ball possession | 37% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 432Lead | Accurate passes | 225 |
| 524Lead | Total passes | 317 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Amed |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.