Match statistics snapshot
- Keçiörengücü created the clearer chances on xG (1.55 vs 1.20, Δ 0.35).
- Keçiörengücü fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- Esenler Erokspor was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Esenler Erokspor |
|---|---|---|
| 1.55Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.20 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Esenler Erokspor |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 293 | Accurate passes | 335Lead |
| 357 | Total passes | 403Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Esenler Erokspor |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Esenler Erokspor |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Esenler Erokspor |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |