Match statistics snapshot
- Keçiörengücü created the clearer chances on xG (4.36 vs 0.31, Δ 4.05).
- Keçiörengücü fired more attempts (31 vs 4 shots).
- Keçiörengücü was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Manisa F.k. |
|---|---|---|
| 4.36Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.31 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 31Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Manisa F.k. |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 314Lead | Accurate passes | 165 |
| 381Lead | Total passes | 217 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Manisa F.k. |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Manisa F.k. |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Keçiörengücü | Statistic | Manisa F.k. |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 2 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |