Match statistics snapshot
- Puskas Academy fired more attempts (24 vs 8 shots).
- Kecskeméti TE was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 25%).
- Puskas Academy held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kecskeméti Te | Statistic | Puskas Academy |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 18Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kecskeméti Te | Statistic | Puskas Academy |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 339 | Accurate passes | 407Lead |
| 424 | Total passes | 492Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kecskeméti Te | Statistic | Puskas Academy |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kecskeméti Te | Statistic | Puskas Academy |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 10Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kecskeméti Te | Statistic | Puskas Academy |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.