Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (0.92 vs 0.55, Δ 0.37).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (9 vs 5 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 0.92Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 24% | Ball possession | 76%Lead |
| 58% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 119 | Accurate passes | 576Lead |
| 206 | Total passes | 679Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.