Match statistics snapshot
- Bodo/Glimt created the clearer chances on xG (1.02 vs 1.76, Δ 0.74).
- Bodo/Glimt fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Bodo/Glimt was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 1.02 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.76Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 48% | Ball possession | 52%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 345 | Accurate passes | 387Lead |
| 422 | Total passes | 469Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| 1.03 | Goals prevented | 1.03 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Bodo/glimt |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.