Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (1.99 vs 1.35, Δ 0.64).
- Brann fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Brann |
|---|---|---|
| 1.99Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.35 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Brann |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 289 | Accurate passes | 356Lead |
| 365 | Total passes | 446Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Brann |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 11Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Brann |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Brann |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 1 | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |