Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (1.17 vs 0.47, Δ 0.70).
- Fredrikstad fired more attempts (9 vs 8 shots).
- Fredrikstad was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 1.17Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.47 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 9Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 64% |
| 376Lead | Accurate passes | 211 |
| 510Lead | Total passes | 328 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |