Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (0.64 vs 0.23, Δ 0.41).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Fredrikstad was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 0.64Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.23 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 80% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 329 | Accurate passes | 453Lead |
| 412 | Total passes | 562Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Fredrikstad |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |