Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (2.34 vs 1.17, Δ 1.17).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (18 vs 9 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 2.34Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.17 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 65% |
| 464Lead | Accurate passes | 177 |
| 550Lead | Total passes | 274 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Ham-kam |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.