Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (11 vs 8 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 81%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 403Lead | Accurate passes | 378 |
| 497Lead | Total passes | 489 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |