Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (4.73 vs 2.57, Δ 2.16).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (27 vs 11 shots).
- Haugesund was more accurate in front of goal (73% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 4.73Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.57 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 22Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 8 | Shots on target | 8 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 362Lead | Accurate passes | 222 |
| 458Lead | Total passes | 321 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Haugesund |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.