Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (2.15 vs 0.29, Δ 1.86).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (20 vs 4 shots).
- Kristiansund BK was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Kristiansund Bk |
|---|---|---|
| 2.15Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.29 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Kristiansund Bk |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 570Lead | Accurate passes | 240 |
| 654Lead | Total passes | 356 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Kristiansund Bk |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Kristiansund Bk |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Kristiansund Bk |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |