Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (1.24 vs 0.47, Δ 0.77).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (11 vs 6 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 1.24Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.47 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 74% |
| 407Lead | Accurate passes | 333 |
| 522Lead | Total passes | 448 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 2Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Lillestrom |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.