Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (2.16 vs 0.09, Δ 2.07).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (17 vs 3 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 2.16Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.09 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 88% | Pass accuracy | 88% |
| 364 | Accurate passes | 507Lead |
| 416 | Total passes | 577Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Molde |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |