Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (1.78 vs 0.82, Δ 0.96).
- Rosenborg fired more attempts (12 vs 6 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 17%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 1.78Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.82 |
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 214 | Accurate passes | 401Lead |
| 289 | Total passes | 486Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.