Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (2.51 vs 0.91, Δ 1.60).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (18 vs 13 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (61% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2.51Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.91 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 18Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 327 | Accurate passes | 445Lead |
| 415 | Total passes | 542Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| 1.43 | Goals prevented | 1.43 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Rosenborg |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.