Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (1.49 vs 0.69, Δ 0.80).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (12 vs 8 shots).
- Sandefjord held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 1.49Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.69 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 241 | Accurate passes | 362Lead |
| 346 | Total passes | 452Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Sandefjord |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.