Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (1.49 vs 0.34, Δ 1.15).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (15 vs 5 shots).
- KFUM Oslo held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 1.49Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.34 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 78%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 394Lead | Accurate passes | 226 |
| 508Lead | Total passes | 337 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.72 | Goals prevented | -0.72 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Start |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.