Match statistics snapshot
- Stromsgodset created the clearer chances on xG (2.29 vs 2.32, Δ 0.03).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (20 vs 14 shots).
- Stromsgodset was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 2.29 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.32Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 14 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 539Lead | Accurate passes | 313 |
| 617Lead | Total passes | 398 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |