Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (1.91 vs 0.55, Δ 1.36).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (13 vs 9 shots).
- KFUM Oslo was more accurate in front of goal (54% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 1.91Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 439Lead | Accurate passes | 289 |
| 510Lead | Total passes | 362 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Stromsgodset |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |