Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (0.86 vs 0.29, Δ 0.57).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (11 vs 4 shots).
- KFUM Oslo held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 0.86Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.29 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Total shots | 4 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 57%Lead | Ball possession | 43% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 504Lead | Accurate passes | 361 |
| 596Lead | Total passes | 457 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Tromso |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |