Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 0.98, Δ 0.21).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (13 vs 12 shots).
- Valerenga was more accurate in front of goal (17% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.98 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 2Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 352Lead | Accurate passes | 348 |
| 424 | Total passes | 443Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Valerenga |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.