Match statistics snapshot
- KFUM Oslo created the clearer chances on xG (0.57 vs 0.55, Δ 0.02).
- KFUM Oslo fired more attempts (10 vs 6 shots).
- Viking was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 0.57Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.55 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 10Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 344 | Accurate passes | 426Lead |
| 461 | Total passes | 540Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.