Match statistics snapshot
- Viking created the clearer chances on xG (0.14 vs 2.21, Δ 2.07).
- Viking fired more attempts (10 vs 2 shots).
- Viking was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 0.14 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.21Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 0 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 2 | Total shots | 10Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 234 | Accurate passes | 535Lead |
| 337 | Total passes | 635Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| 0.00 | Goals prevented | 0.00 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kfum Oslo | Statistic | Viking |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 2Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |