Match statistics snapshot
- KI Klaksvik created the clearer chances on xG (1.79 vs 0.84, Δ 0.95).
- Olimpija Ljubljana fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- KI Klaksvik was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ki Klaksvik | Statistic | Olimpija Ljubljana |
|---|---|---|
| 1.79Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.84 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 8 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 4 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ki Klaksvik | Statistic | Olimpija Ljubljana |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 81%Lead |
| 307 | Accurate passes | 400Lead |
| 407 | Total passes | 491Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ki Klaksvik | Statistic | Olimpija Ljubljana |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ki Klaksvik | Statistic | Olimpija Ljubljana |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ki Klaksvik | Statistic | Olimpija Ljubljana |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |