Match statistics snapshot
- AIK created the clearer chances on xG (0.66 vs 1.74, Δ 1.08).
- AIK fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- AIK was more accurate in front of goal (27% on target vs 10%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 0.66 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.74Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 75% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 245 | Accurate passes | 300Lead |
| 325 | Total passes | 393Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Aik |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.