Match statistics snapshot
- Häcken W created the clearer chances on xG (1.04 vs 2.58, Δ 1.54).
- Häcken W fired more attempts (22 vs 13 shots).
- Häcken W was more accurate in front of goal (32% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 1.04 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.58Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 10Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 22Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 272 | Accurate passes | 418Lead |
| 351 | Total passes | 497Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Häcken W |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow cards | 0 |