Match statistics snapshot
- Kristianstad created the clearer chances on xG (0.45 vs 2.86, Δ 2.41).
- Kristianstad fired more attempts (27 vs 5 shots).
- KIF Örebro was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 44%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Kristianstad |
|---|---|---|
| 0.45 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.86Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 21Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 12Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 27Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Kristianstad |
|---|---|---|
| 29% | Ball possession | 71%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 214 | Accurate passes | 543Lead |
| 305 | Total passes | 630Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Kristianstad |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 12Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Kristianstad |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Kristianstad |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Fouls | 3Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow cards | 0 |
Statistics is not available yet.