Match statistics snapshot
- KIF Örebro created the clearer chances on xG (1.74 vs 1.01, Δ 0.73).
- Linköping fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Linköping was more accurate in front of goal (53% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Linköping |
|---|---|---|
| 1.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.01 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 7Lead |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Linköping |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 261 | Accurate passes | 512Lead |
| 342 | Total passes | 605Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Linköping |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Linköping |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Linköping |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Fouls | 3Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |