Match statistics snapshot
- Piteå W created the clearer chances on xG (0.13 vs 2.72, Δ 2.59).
- Piteå W fired more attempts (24 vs 3 shots).
- KIF Örebro was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 0.13 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.72Lead |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 0 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 10Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 237 | Accurate passes | 324Lead |
| 337 | Total passes | 425Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Piteå W |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow cards | 0 |