Match statistics snapshot
- KIF Örebro created the clearer chances on xG (1.19 vs 0.63, Δ 0.56).
- Vittsjö was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 17%).
- KIF Örebro held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 1.19Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.63 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 407Lead | Accurate passes | 341 |
| 512Lead | Total passes | 433 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kif Örebro | Statistic | Vittsjö |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.