Match statistics snapshot
- Kilmarnock fired more attempts (20 vs 9 shots).
- Kilmarnock was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 11%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 7Lead | Shots off target |
| 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 58%Lead | Pass accuracy | 49% |
| 174Lead | Accurate passes | 138 |
| 300Lead | Total passes | 284 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 15Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |