Match statistics snapshot
- Kilmarnock fired more attempts (17 vs 15 shots).
- Kilmarnock was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 27%).
- Hamilton Academical held more of the ball (56% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Hamilton Academical |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| 3 | Shots off target | 6Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Hamilton Academical |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 250 | Accurate passes | 352Lead |
| 358 | Total passes | 443Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Hamilton Academical |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Hamilton Academical |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Hamilton Academical |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Statistics is not available yet.