Match statistics snapshot
- Kilmarnock created the clearer chances on xG (1.12 vs 0.80, Δ 0.32).
- Heart Of Midlothian fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Kilmarnock was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Heart Of Midlothian |
|---|---|---|
| 1.12Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.80 |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Heart Of Midlothian |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 214 | Accurate passes | 379Lead |
| 316 | Total passes | 499Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Heart Of Midlothian |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Heart Of Midlothian |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| 0.74 | Goals prevented | 0.74 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Heart Of Midlothian |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |