Match statistics snapshot
- Kilmarnock created the clearer chances on xG (1.60 vs 1.44, Δ 0.16).
- Livingston fired more attempts (15 vs 8 shots).
- Livingston was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| 1.60Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.44 |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 174 | Accurate passes | 382Lead |
| 264 | Total passes | 479Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |