Match statistics snapshot
- Rangers fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Kilmarnock was more accurate in front of goal (30% on target vs 20%).
- Rangers held more of the ball (68% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 3 |
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 32% | Ball possession | 68%Lead |
| 57% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 151 | Accurate passes | 458Lead |
| 265 | Total passes | 569Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |