Match statistics snapshot
- Rangers created the clearer chances on xG (0.81 vs 1.42, Δ 0.61).
- Kilmarnock fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Rangers was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 0.81 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.42Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 186 | Accurate passes | 363Lead |
| 272 | Total passes | 437Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kilmarnock | Statistic | Rangers |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 11Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.