Match statistics snapshot
- LNZ Cherkasy created the clearer chances on xG (0.80 vs 1.59, Δ 0.79).
- LNZ Cherkasy fired more attempts (16 vs 9 shots).
- Kolos Kovalivka was more accurate in front of goal (44% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kolos Kovalivka | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 0.80 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.59Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 9 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kolos Kovalivka | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 31% | Ball possession | 69%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 205 | Accurate passes | 566Lead |
| 261 | Total passes | 648Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kolos Kovalivka | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kolos Kovalivka | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kolos Kovalivka | Statistic | Lnz Cherkasy |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 12Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |