Match statistics snapshot
- Kooteepee created the clearer chances on xG (2.27 vs 0.53, Δ 1.74).
- Kooteepee fired more attempts (14 vs 6 shots).
- Mariehamn held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kooteepee | Statistic | Mariehamn |
|---|---|---|
| 2.27Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kooteepee | Statistic | Mariehamn |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 84% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 412 | Accurate passes | 553Lead |
| 491 | Total passes | 629Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kooteepee | Statistic | Mariehamn |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kooteepee | Statistic | Mariehamn |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kooteepee | Statistic | Mariehamn |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |