Match statistics snapshot
- Genk created the clearer chances on xG (0.61 vs 2.22, Δ 1.61).
- Genk fired more attempts (16 vs 12 shots).
- Genk was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kortrijk | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 0.61 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.22Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kortrijk | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 244 | Accurate passes | 489Lead |
| 328 | Total passes | 575Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kortrijk | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kortrijk | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kortrijk | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.