Match statistics snapshot
- KRC Genk II fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Zulte Waregem was more accurate in front of goal (64% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Krc Genk Ii | Statistic | Zulte Waregem |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 5Lead |
| 2 |
| 6 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Krc Genk Ii | Statistic | Zulte Waregem |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 409Lead | Accurate passes | 392 |
| 480Lead | Total passes | 471 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Krc Genk Ii | Statistic | Zulte Waregem |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Krc Genk Ii | Statistic | Zulte Waregem |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 4 | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Krc Genk Ii | Statistic | Zulte Waregem |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.