Match statistics snapshot
- Hammarby created the clearer chances on xG (0.21 vs 1.28, Δ 1.07).
- Hammarby fired more attempts (12 vs 4 shots).
- Hammarby was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kristianstad | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 0.21 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.28Lead |
| 4 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kristianstad | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 75%Lead |
| 338Lead | Accurate passes | 301 |
| 454Lead | Total passes | 402 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kristianstad | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kristianstad | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kristianstad | Statistic | Hammarby |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.