Match statistics snapshot
- Kristianstad created the clearer chances on xG (0.75 vs 0.32, Δ 0.43).
- Kristianstad fired more attempts (13 vs 3 shots).
- KIF Örebro was more accurate in front of goal (67% on target vs 46%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kristianstad | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 0.75Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.32 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 3Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kristianstad | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 55%Lead | Ball possession | 45% |
| 74%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 330Lead | Accurate passes | 191 |
| 446Lead | Total passes | 280 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kristianstad | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kristianstad | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kristianstad | Statistic | Kif Örebro |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0 | Yellow cards | 0 |
Statistics is not available yet.