Match statistics snapshot
- KuPS created the clearer chances on xG (1.52 vs 1.06, Δ 0.46).
- HJK Helsinki fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- KuPS was more accurate in front of goal (58% on target vs 21%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kups | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 1.52Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.06 |
| 0 | Offsides | 0 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kups | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 90%Lead |
| 328 | Accurate passes | 621Lead |
| 384 | Total passes | 691Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kups | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kups | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kups | Statistic | Hjk Helsinki |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 7 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |