Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (2.24 vs 1.21, Δ 1.03).
- KVC Westerlo fired more attempts (20 vs 15 shots).
- AS Eupen was more accurate in front of goal (47% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 2.24Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.21 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 16Lead | Shots inside the box | 11 |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 15 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 376Lead | Accurate passes | 351 |
| 461Lead | Total passes | 440 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | As Eupen |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |