Match statistics snapshot
- KVC Westerlo created the clearer chances on xG (1.37 vs 1.09, Δ 0.28).
- KVC Westerlo fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- KVC Westerlo was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 1.37Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.09 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 35% | Ball possession | 65%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 183 | Accurate passes | 412Lead |
| 269 | Total passes | 493Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Genk |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 13 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.