Match statistics snapshot
- Gent created the clearer chances on xG (1.78 vs 1.82, Δ 0.04).
- Gent fired more attempts (18 vs 16 shots).
- Gent was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 1.78 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.82Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 9 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 9Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 16 | Total shots | 18Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 287 | Accurate passes | 414Lead |
| 364 | Total passes | 499Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |