Match statistics snapshot
- Gent created the clearer chances on xG (0.14 vs 3.44, Δ 3.30).
- Gent fired more attempts (21 vs 3 shots).
- KVC Westerlo was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 0.14 | Expected goals (xG) | 3.44Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 14Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 21Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 34% | Ball possession | 66%Lead |
| 69% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 202 | Accurate passes | 479Lead |
| 294 | Total passes | 576Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 8Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Kvc Westerlo | Statistic | Gent |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 13Lead |
| 2 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |